Electricity Tutorial 4 - Resistivity
resistance of a wire depends on three factors:
length; double the length, the resistance doubles.
area; double the area, the resistance halves.
material that the wire is made of.
Resistivity is a property of the material. It is defined as the resistance of a wire of the material of unit area and unit length.
The formula for resistivity is:
In physics code we write this as:
We can rewrite this to give:
There are three bear traps
Constantan has a resistivity of 47 ´ 10-8 W m. How much of this wire is needed to make a 10 W resistor, if the diameter is 0.50 mm? Give your answer to an appropriate number of significant figures.
The reciprocal or inverse of resistivity is conductivity. It has the physics code s, (“sigma”, a Greek letter ‘s’), and units Siemens per metre (S m-1).
Conductivity is given by the relationship:
A super-conductor is a material that has zero resistance. A current flows when there is no potential difference. The piece of metal floating above the magnet shows that there must be a current flowing.
Picture from Wikimedia Commons.
Authors: Julien Bobroff and Frederic Bouquet
For all metals the resistivity (hence resistance) decreases as they get colder.
For some metals like copper and silver, there is still a tiny bit of resistance left at very low temperatures.
Very low temperatures have to be maintained, which is expensive. Room temperature superconductivity has not been seen.
Super-conductivity is seen in:
Some heavily-doped semi-conductors.
All superconductors have a critical temperature above which the phenomenon stops. The graph below shows the idea:
Above the boiling point of liquid nitrogen, 77 K (-196 oC), superconductivity can be observed in a few materials. These are called high temperature superconductors.
Very large magnets such as those found in the large hadron collider have coils made of superconducting materials. It is believed that the superconductivity will last 100 000 years, as long as the coils don’t go above their critical temperature.
The mechanism for super-conduction is complex, and cannot be explained in terms of electrons colliding with ions. The Meisner Effect and flux trapping are not required on the syllabus.
The mechanism for super-conduction is complex, and cannot be explained in terms of electrons colliding with ions.
Explain what happens when a super-conducting metal reaches its critical temperature.
Metallic Conduction (Extension)
Electricity moves due to the movement of charge carriers. If we think about an ionic solution, the positive ions are attracted to the negative terminal (the cathode), while the negative ion are attracted to the positive terminal (the anode).
In a metallic conductor (wire), the simplest model of conduction is to consider the metal as a lattice of metal ions in a sea of free electrons. The electrons move about randomly.
When a voltage is applied across the ends of the wire, the electrons continue to move randomly, but there is an overall drift to the positive end of the wire. So you will (rightly) think that electrons go from negative to positive. The protons don't move. So this idea is opposite to what you have been told. The explanation is that the earliest physicists got it wrong. They didn't know about electrons in the Eighteenth Century. So instead of rewriting all the rules of electricity, people talked about conventional current going from positive to negative. All currents are regarded as conventional.
Resistivity is the resistance of a wire of 1 metre length and of 1 m2 cross sectional area. According to this model, resistance arises due to the vibration of the metal ions, and the probability of the ions colliding with the free electrons. Resistance is a representation of the probability of collisions. Such collisions involve a change of energy from kinetic energy to internal energy. The increase in internal energy makes the temperature in the ions rise, hence increases the probability of a collision. Therefore the resistance increases as the wire gets hotter.
How fast do electrons move?
When a voltage is applied across the ends of the wire, the electrons continue to move randomly, but there is an overall drift to the positive end of the wire. So you will (rightly) think that electrons go from negative to positive. The protons don't move. So this idea is opposite to what you have been told. The explanation is that the earliest physicists got it wrong. They didn't know about electrons in the Eighteenth Century. So instead of rewriting all the rules of electricity, people talked about conventional current going from positive to negative.
We can write an equation for the conduction of a current in a wire. The current depends on:
The speed of the charge carriers (v (m/s));
The area of the wire (
The charge on the electrons (
The number of charge carriers per unit volume (
The symbols in italics are the physics codes for the various quantities, and the units are given as well.
The formula is:
I = nAve
The number of charge carriers per unit volume is probably the hardest quantity to get your head round. It means the number of electrons in a cubic metre of the material. For example, copper has 8 × 1028electrons in each cubic metre of material. You can look up the number of electrons per cubic metre in a data book.
Consider a piece of metal that is l m long and has an area of A m2. It is made of a metal that has N free electrons m-3. Let's suppose that a current of I A is flowing. Each electron has a charge of e C.
We know that current is the flow of charge every second.
The total charge is the number of electrons multiplied by the volume of the metal and the charge on each electron:
So we can substitute for Q:
The term l/t is a distance over time which is speed, v m s-1. So we write:
I = nAve
A wire is carrying a current of 200 A. Its cross sectional area is 7.85 × 10-5 m2. If copper has 8.0 × 1028 electrons per cubic metre, what is the speed of the electron drift? Give your answer to an appropriate number of significant figures.
Rearrange the equation:
v = 200 A ÷ (8.0 × 1028 m-3 × 7.85 × 10-5 m2 × 1.6 × 10-19 C) = 2.0 × 10-4 m s-1
The answer is given to 2 significant figures as the data are given to two significant figures.
The result from this calculation shows that the speed of electron
drift is slow, 1 mm every 5 seconds. The propagation of the message "that
the current is flowing" is very fast, not far off the speed of light. But the
drift speed of electrons is not at all fast. We can show this by putting a
small crystal of potassium permanganate (a dark purple ionic compound) onto a
filter paper which has been soaked in sodium chloride solution. When a current
flows, the purple permanganate ions move towards the positive terminal, but it
takes some time.
In questions on this, you may be given a diameter of a wire. To work out the area, you must use the formula:
You must convert millimetres to metres when using the equation.
Now try this example:
A copper wire of diameter 1.4 mm connects to the tungsten filament of a light bulb of which the diameter is 0.020 mm. The current in both materials is 0.52 A. Find the speed of an electron in each of the two materials.
Copper has 8 × 1028 electrons per cubic metre. Tungsten has 3.4 × 1028 m-3.
The tungsten filament has a higher resistance than the copper wire. For the same current to pass through, the electrons have to go faster, because:
The number of charge carriers per cubic metre is smaller;
The area is smaller.
This is opposite to the generally perceived idea that electrons are slowed down by high resistances. There is a greater chance of a collision, so the wire will hotter.
Models of semiconduction are to be found in Tutorial 6.